All Reports

The Office of the Inspector General previously conducted an evaluation of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) Site Security (Evaluation 2018-15550, issued September 24, 2018) to identify strengths and risks that could affect SQN Site Security’s organizational effectiveness. Our report identified several strengths and risks along with recommendations for addressing those risks. In response to that report, Tennessee Valley Authority management provided their management decision.

The Office of the Inspector General previously conducted an evaluation of Human Resources (Evaluation Report 2016-15445-05, issued September 26, 2017) to identify operational and cultural strengths and areas for improvement that could impact Human Resources’ organizational effectiveness. Our report identified several operational and cultural areas for improvement and included recommendations for addressing those areas.

The Office of the Inspector General previously conducted a review of Human Resources (Evaluation Report 2016-15445-05, issued September 26, 2017) to identify operational and cultural strengths and areas for improvement that could impact Human Resources’ organizational effectiveness. Our report identified several operational and cultural areas for improvement and included recommendations for addressing those areas. In response, we received Human Resources’ management decision on December 4, 2017.

At the request of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), we performed an audit of costs paid by TVA to AECOM Energy and Construction, Inc. (AECOM) for engineering services under Contract No. 8273. The contract provided for TVA to compensate AECOM for work on either a cost reimbursable or fixed price basis. Our audit objective was to determine if the costs were billed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.

In 2016, TVA implemented an individual performance multiplier (IPM) that allows managers to adjust employees’ annual Short-Term Incentive lump-sum payouts based on performance. Since alignment between the multiplier and performance are important to the success of the initiative, we scheduled an evaluation of TVA’s IPM. Our objective was to determine if IPMs were in alignment with performance ratings. We reviewed 5,235 adjustable payouts made in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, and found most of the IPM adjustments were in alignment with overall performance ratings.

Based on the importance of the System Operations Center to the transmission system, we performed an evaluation of the site-selection process to determine if the selected site (1) met regulatory requirements and established criteria and (2) provided financial or operational benefits over other potential locations considered.We determined the site selected for the System Operations Center met established criteria and regulatory requirements. However, we could not determine if the site selected provided financial or operational benefits over other potential locations considered.

The Office of the Inspector General audited TVA’s Hydro Generation’s cybersecurity controls. We found TVA had (1) a potential single point of failure that could affect TVA’s ability to operate effectively in the event of a disaster, (2) not configured network devices in a consistent manner, and (3) not maintained updated network documentation. TVA management provided their planned actions to address the recommendations.

The Office of the Inspector General conducted a review of Shawnee Fossil Plant (SHF) to identify operational and cultural strengths and areas for improvement that could impact SHF’s organizational effectiveness. Our report identified strengths that positively affected the day-to-day activities of SHF personnel. These strengths related to (1) organizational alignment, (2) teamwork within working groups and with other SHF departments, (3) effective leadership, (4) positive ethical culture, and (5) resources necessary for job execution.

Due to the risk of incorrectly dispositioning nuclear outage materials, we initiated an evaluation of nuclear outage material management. Our objective was to determine if TVA is managing designated outage material following an outage to maximize use and minimize cost. We determined TVA generally managed designated outage materials to maximize use and minimize cost. Specifically, we found (1) no instances where TVA missed material redeployment opportunities for designated outage materials and (2) all outage items designated for surplus and subsequently repurchased were warranted.

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) previously conducted an evaluation of Sourcing (Evaluation 2017-15514, August 17, 2018) to identify strengths and risks that could affect Sourcing’s organizational effectiveness. Our report identified several strengths and risks along with recommendations for addressing those risks. In response to a draft of that report, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) management provided their management decision.