All Reports

We audited the costs billed to TVA by a contractor for providing turbine generator outage services at TVA nuclear plants. Our audit included $57.4 million in payments TVA made to the contractor. We found the contractor overbilled or had not provided services to TVA totaling an estimated $281,023, including: (1) $171,150 of labor and per diem costs that were either unsupported or unallowable; (2) $6,729 of overbilled fixed price labor; and (3) $103,144 of engineering services that were not provided in accordance with the terms of the contract. Summary Only

This redacted Report of Administrative Inquiry regarding a personnel matter was released on September 14, 2009, in response to an administrative appeal of a FOIA request.The OIG reported that a TVA employee provided false information to the OIG during an OIG inspection of the Maintain and Gain (M&G) Program.

We completed agreed-upon procedures to assist the Center for Resource Solutions (CRS) in determining TVA's compliance with the annual reporting requirements of CRS' Green Pricing Accreditation Program for the year ended December 31, 2008. The required information on TVA's renewable energy initiative, "Green Power Switch," was provided to CRS, including five identified exceptions and explanations. Summary Only

We audited the costs billed to TVA by a contractor for the design, engineer, and delivery of air preheater equipment for TVA fossil plants. Our audit, which covered $23.2 million TVA had paid the contractor, found TVA had been overbilled at least $2,232,780.The contract provided for all work, with the exception of a baseline project at Allen Fossil Plant, to be performed on a cost reimbursable basis.

The OIG performed a review of Lewisburg Electric System (LES) which is a distributor for TVA power based in Lewisburg, Tennessee. Our review of LES found no material issues related to (1) the proper reporting of electric sales and (2) nondiscrimination in providing electricity to members of the same rate class. However, we found a contract compliance issue regarding LES's execution of contracts with customers with demand greater than 50 kW.In addition, we found that LES had more than enough cash on hand to fund planned capital expenditures and provide a cash reserve.

The OIG performed a review of Monroe County Electric Power Association (Monroe) which is a distributor for TVA power based in Amory, Mississippi. Our review of Monroe found no material issues related to (1) the proper reporting of electric sales, and (2) nondiscrimination in providing electricity to members of the same rate class.

This report to Congress and the TVA Board comes at a time of historic challenges for TVA. We chronicle some of those recent challenges in the "Special Feature" on page 16 of our report. In many ways, a "perfect storm" has developed that has changed the landscape of TVA forever. As we note, a federal district court in Asheville, North Carolina, has ruled that a number of TVA's fossil fuel plants have created a "public nuisance" that must be abated in short order.

Following are observations from the review of documentation for 30 claims:Of the 12 claims that were disputed, 2 of the dispute letters were not submitted within 30 days after the notice of injury, as required by federal code.One claim did not include the supervisor's signature on the form.In one instance, the claim was not submitted to the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs within ten business days, due to a supervisor not forwarding his/her completed portion of the form within the allotted eight days, as required by federal code and TVA policy, respectively.We found prescr

We audited $211.6 million of costs billed to TVA by a contractor from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2007, for the administration of TVA's medical benefit program. Our objective was to determine if the costs billed to TVA were in compliance with the contract terms and conditions. In summary, we found TVA had potentially been overbilled up to an estimated $473,024.

We reviewed TVA's process for ensuring it does not knowingly contract with vendors that have been: (1) debarred or suspended by the federal government and/or (2) found unsatisfactory within TVA. In summary, we determined:TVA does not have formal procedures for ensuring TVA does not knowingly contract with vendors that have been debarred or suspended by the federal government.