All Reports

We audited $61.92 million in costs billed to TVA by a contractor, under two contracts for performing engineering services between October 2004 and December 2008 and found TVA had been overbilled $683,122 as follows:TVA was overbilled $70,838 because labor costs were billed using hourly billing rates instead of cost reimbursable payment terms as required by the contracts.TVA was billed $558,463 in ineligible and excessive temporary living costs because (1) short-term daily travel rates were paid to employees instead of (lower) long-term temporary living allowances, and (2) unauthorized local

As part of our annual audit plan, we reviewed the process for postponing and cancelling fossil capital projects. Our objective was to determine whether fiscal years 2007 and 2008 project postponements and cancellations were properly approved, effectively communicated, and monitored to prevent inappropriate charges. We determined that Fossil Generation (FG) projects were approved by the appropriate levels of authority and contained a capital classification designated by Fixed Asset Accounting (FAA).

As part of our annual audit plan, we reviewed the process for postponing and cancelling capital projects. Our objectives were to determine whether fiscal years 2007 and 2008 project postponements and cancellations for River Operations (RO) were properly approved, effectively communicated, and monitored to prevent inappropriate charges. We determined all sampled cancelled capital projects reviewed were approved by the appropriate levels of authority and contained a capital classification designated by Fixed Asset Accounting (FAA).

As part of our annual audit plan, we reviewed the process for postponing and cancelling Power System Operations (PSO) capital projects.

As part of our annual audit plan, we reviewed the process for postponing and cancelling Nuclear Power Group (NPG) capital projects. Our audit objectives were to determine whether fiscal years (FY) 2007 and 2008 project postponements and cancellations were (1) properly approved, (2) effectively communicated, and (3) monitored to prevent inappropriate charges.Based on our review, we determined that NPG's postponed and cancelled projects contained a capital classification designated by Fixed Asset Accounting (FAA) and that justifications for postponing/cancelling projets were valid.

We audited $4.27 million of costs billed to TVA by a contractor for providing preemptive full structural weld overlays on Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2. In summary, we found the contractor billed TVA $320,700 in unsupported and ineligible costs including (1) $271,200 of unsupported delay costs, and (2) $49,500 of ineligible billings for the cleaning and handling of equipment that was contaminated before it was shipped to TVA. We recommended TVA management recover $320,700 in unsupported and ineligible costs from the contractor. Summary Only

The Tennessee Valley Authority continues to live under the cloud of the Kingston ash spill of December 2008. The Office of the Inspector General is reminded of this shadow every day through our continuing review of TVA's efforts to return the Kingston area to its former state. We see TVA making steady progress on the physical cleanup; but more importantly, we see signs of an improvement in the TVA culture that contributed to this unfortunate environmental event.In this semiannual report, we ask the question, Culture: Asset or Liability?

We performed an audit of the prices billed to the Tennessee Valley Authority by a contractor for certain equipment related to dry cask storage systems for spent nuclear fuel at Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN). In summary, we found TVA had been overbilled $276,000 because the contractor overstated the price of a vertical crawler that had been delivered to BFN. The overstatement resulted because the contractor did not follow the contract's pricing criteria which required the price of the BFN vertical crawler to be set at cost plus 10 percent.

We reviewed TVA's Hearing Conservation Program (the Program) to determine whether (1) the Program complied with Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) regulations, and (2) TVA organizations were in compliance with the Program guidelines. We also looked at actions taken to address recommendations in a prior, related OIG report. We found TVA's Hearing Conservation Program complied with significant provisions of 29 CFR Part 1910.95, "Occupational Noise Exposure" issued by OSHA.

The OIG performed a review of Murphy Power Board (Murphy), a distributor for TVA power based in Murphy, North Carolina. Our review of Murphy found issues involving customer classification and metering that could impact (1) the proper reporting of electric sales, and (2) nondiscrimination in providing electricity to members of the same rate class.